![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Without moving our lips or tongue, we can talk to ourselves or recite mentally a selection of verse. The psychological character of our sound-images becomes apparent when we observe our own speech. The sound-image is sensory, and if I happen to call it “material,” it is only in that sense, and by way of opposing it to the other term of the association, the concept, which is generally more abstract. The latter is not the material sound, a purely physical thing, but the psychological imprint of the sound, the impression that it makes on our senses. The linguistic sign unites, not a thing and a name, but a concept and a sound-image. We have seen in considering the speaking-circuit that both terms involved in the linguistic sign are psychological and are united in the brain by an associative bond. But this rather naive approach can bring us near the truth by showing us that the linguistic unit is a double entity, one formed by the associating of two terms. It assumes that ready-made ideas exist before words it does not tell us whether a name is vocal or psychological in nature (arbor, for instance, can be considered from either viewpoint) finally, it lets us assume that the linking of a name and a thing is a very simple operation-an assumption that is anything but true. We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |